|
NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY |
|
|
|
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES |
|
|
|
MARCH 3, 2000 2:00 P.M. |
|
|
|
501 ASTI ROAD |
|
CLOVERDALE DEPOT |
|
CLOVERDALE, CALIFORNIA |
|
|
|
A. CALL TO ORDER |
|
Chair Robert Jehn called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m. |
|
|
B. ROLL CALL |
|
Finance Committee Directors present: Chair Robert Jehn, Robert E. Simonson, and, by phone, |
|
Daniel Opalach. |
|
Also present: Executive Director Max H. Bridges, Russ Mustola, CPA, and, by phone, General |
|
Counsel Christopher J. Neary. |
|
Additional attendees: Members of the public including representatives of Rail-Ways, Inc. and |
|
the press. |
|
|
|
C. MINUTES |
|
1. Approval of Minutes of the Finance Committee Meeting of January 12, 2000 |
|
2. Approval of Minutes of the Finance Committee Meeting of February 8, 2000 |
Motion by Dir. Simonson; seconded by Dir. Opalach to approve Minutes of both |
meetings with a modification to the February 8, 2000 Minutes to include that Dir. |
Simonson attempted to participate by teleconference, but was unable. |
|
|
D. AGENDA APPROVAL |
|
The Agenda stands approved by Chair Jehn. |
|
|
|
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS |
|
Dana Fuller of Richmond, California, asked about an internet message regarding a public |
|
meeting in Eureka attended by Dan Hauser in which he says that it appears that NCRA and |
|
Rail-Ways have pretty much written off the Northern end of the line. |
|
Chair Jehn and Executive Dir. Bridges emphatically indicated that is not the case. |
|
|
|
John Darling, President of Rail-Ways, Inc., reported lay-offs due to funding issues and that all |
|
services are suspended; however, he assured the Committee that his company is here for the |
|
“long haul.” He has requested the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) inspect the Railroad |
|
and considers it ironic that the line could be opened, yet service suspended. Chair Jehn |
|
responded favorably to his suggestion for a special board meeting if an opportunity for possible |
|
solutions to this financial crises arises. In response to Dir. Opalach’s question regarding past |
|
FRA inspections, Ron Poulsen, Chief Engineer of Northwestern Pacific Railways Co., LLC, |
|
indicated one in late May or early June in Willits and one in late June from Lombard to Schellville which passed. Then one in September where it became apparent the track was to be held to a higher standard than previously thought. |
|
|
|
F. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS |
|
1. Status of AB 2782 Funds |
|
Russ Mustola, Consulting Accountant, reported CalTrans is processing the Prop. 116 |
|
payment that reimburses NCRA for AB2782 funds advanced to contractors. Executive |
|
Dir. Bridges indicated that NCRA has less than $3000 and payroll is unpaid as of the end |
|
of last month. Mr. Mustola reported that of the Prop. 116 check expected approximately |
|
$143,000 should be returned to NCRA and the rest should be considered Federal |
|
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Disaster 1203 funds because NCRA also used |
|
Disaster money in obtaining Prop. 116 reimbursment. The Prop. 116 check is expected |
|
as early as March 6, 2000. |
|
|
|
2. Report on the Status of the Single-Year Audits |
|
Mr. Mustola thanked General Counsel Chris Neary for the letter. The issue with Warren |
|
Staley is not resolved, however, he has indicated that Aycock and Edgmon, CPAs, can |
|
rely on the balances they carried forward. Aycock and Edgmon are drafting the 1997 and |
|
1998 financial statements to present at the March Board meeting. In addition, they are |
|
working on the 1999 financial statements. Mr. Neary indicated Mr. Staley will be sending |
|
a revised report. Mr. Bridges reported that completion of these single year audits will |
|
fulfill one requirement necessary to receive approximately $8 million in Intermodal |
|
Surface Transportation Enactment Act (ISTEA) funds. He also reported that NCRA has |
|
not received the results of an audit performed by CalTrans. Mr. Darling commented that |
|
Rail-Ways is being audited by CalTrans. Mr. Mustola commented designation as a “High |
|
Risk” subgrantee allows CalTrans to hold NCRA to a higher standard. Additionally, he |
|
believes granting agencies might assume Rail-Ways is not financially independent from |
|
NCRA and, therefore, not entitled to earn a profit. |
|
|
|
3. Distribution of Anticipated Disaster 1044 Reimbursement Funds for a Net |
|
Small Project Cost Overrun |
|
Executive Dir. Bridges reported NCRA is expecting approximately $200,000 |
|
possibly Wednesday. Several scenarios were discussed with regard to the |
|
distribution of these funds; Mr. Bridges spoke of paying Disaster 1044 |
|
creditor debt, Mr. Darling spoke of applying the payment as a reduction in |
|
the security agreement, and Mr. Neary indicated there were more options |
|
including integrating use of anticipated income from a contract with Williams |
|
Communications. Mr. Neary volunteered, with the assistance of Max, to draft |
|
options to present them at the next Regular Board Meeting with a |
|
recommendation from the committee. Dir. Simonson moved to recommend, |
|
based on Mr. Neary’s analysis that the intent of the Security Agreement |
|
with Rail-Ways was to include payment from all prior disasters, the funds be |
|
given to Rail-Ways. Dir. Opalach seconded. Motion carried unanimously. |
|
|
|
4. Status of South End Rehabilitation Projects |
|
a. Original and Revised Project Budgets |
|
b. Actual Funds Now Available |
|
c. Contractual “Not To Exceed” Amounts |
|
d. Items Disallowed by Funding Agencies |
|
e. Actual Expenditures |
|
f. Equitable Distribution of Revenues |
|
g. Committee Recommendation to the NCRA Board |
|
Executive Dir. Bridges reported a potential agreement was reached during a |
|
meeting with Rail-Ways and Herzog to decide the future disbursement of funds, |
|
including retention, according to a calculation based on “not to exceed” contractual |
|
amounts instead of amounts actually billed. |
|
|
|
Chair Jehn left at 4:15 p.m. |
|
|
|
G. ADJOURNMENT |
|
Dir. Simonson adjourned the meeting at 4:40 p.m. |