|
NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY (NCRA) |
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES |
|
|
|
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 12, 2000 AT 10:00 A.M. |
|
|
HUMBOLDT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CHAMBERS |
825 FIFTH STREET, FIRST FLOOR, EUREKA, CALIFORNIA |
|
|
|
|
A. CALL TO ORDER |
|
Chair Jehn called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. |
|
|
|
B. ROLL CALL |
|
Directors present: Chair Jehn, First Vice Chair David Ripple, Allan Hemphill, Jack McKellar, Daniel |
|
Opalach, Robert E. Simonson, and Max Schlienger. |
|
Directors absent: None. |
|
Also present: Executive Director Max H. Bridges, General Counsel Christopher J. Neary, Property |
|
Manager Cyndee Logan, and Administrative Assistant Pamela Fishtrom. |
|
|
|
C. MINUTES |
1. Approval of Minutes of the March 15, 2000 Regular Board Meeting |
|
2. Approval of Minutes of the March 24, 2000 Special Board Meeting |
|
|
Dir. Ripple motioned to approve both sets of Minutes with the following revisions: a |
recommendation to insert paragraph breaks into the longer items in both sets of Minutes; and, ofthe March 15, 2000 Regular Meeting Minutes, a change under Item E – Public Comments, 5th |
|
Paragraph, to indicate Chair Jehn announced he must leave at 11:45 a.m. instead of 12:45 p.m. |
|
Seconded by Dir. Hemphill. Vote taken; motion carried. |
|
|
D. AGENDA APPROVAL |
|
|
Dir. Ripple motioned to approve the Agenda with the following changes; Item F.2. to follow the |
Closed Session; and Item F.4. continued to a future meeting. Seconded by Dir. Simonson. |
Vote taken; motion carried. |
|
|
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS |
|
Bill Burton recommended NCRA partner with CalTrans in rebuilding the transportation facility. |
|
|
|
Fred Carmichael addressed the need for repair with money available for the Eel River canyon to |
|
facilitate the movement of bulk products. The Southern portion of the Railroad will be funded because |
|
of the need for mass transportation. |
|
|
|
John Friedenbach of L & M Renner Petroleum, a major creditor, requested all prior Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds be paid, as was the intended use of those funds, to prior creditors. |
|
|
|
Robert and Debra Kamberg, an employee of Northwestern Pacific Railway and wife, expressed dismay |
|
over the lack of regular pay. |
|
|
|
David Gavrich, President of Waste Solutions Group that contracts with Humboldt County to transfer |
|
solid waste, stated his willingness to ship by rail when rail is consistently available. |
|
|
|
John Mahoney, resident of Miranda in Southern Humboldt County and member of Friends of the Eel |
|
River, spoke because he rafted from Dos Rios to Alderpoint, and he wonders if enough money has been |
|
set aside to stabilize the slides, remove scrap, and stop the sloughing off of dirt which affects fish. |
|
|
|
John Franklin from Laytonville recommended spending funds wisely by allowing Rail-Ways to repair |
|
the South End and a portion of the North End, and paying creditors with available public funds because |
|
it is not possible to fix the canyon for $60 to $80 million. He presented to the Board a colander with a |
|
toothpick to symbolize Mr. Chesbro’s efforts to secure $65,000,000 for NWP from the State budget. |
|
|
|
Kay Strickland, Citizens for Port Development, spoke in favor of completing repairs from Willits to |
|
Eureka to facilitate the Harbor/Rail relationship, and she congratulated the Board for being considered |
|
in the Governor’s budget. |
|
|
|
Dir. Simonson responded to Mr. Franklin’s comments by sharing his experience as a retired employee |
|
of NWP; for forty years the North End was repaired and maintained with only periodic closures with |
|
one exception – the 100-year flood of 1964. Mr. Franklin responded that he is in favor of |
segmentation, only deferring the repair of the canyon until the public is made aware of the full cost. |
|
|
F. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS |
|
1. Further Consideration of Federal Emergency Management Agency Alternate Project |
|
Proposal Continued from NCRA Special Meeting of March 24, 2000 |
|
Executive Dir. Bridges reported four alternatives are proposed for the FEMA restoration of the line. |
|
Option 1: The improved project as originally planned that is subject to environmental assessment |
|
where numerous responses have been received . Option 2: The alternate project which takes 90% |
|
of the money identified for the North End and moves it to the South End. Option 3: The improved- |
|
alternate project that segments the line allowing for repair South of Willits and North of South |
|
Fork. Option 4: The revised improved project which allows the entire line to become an improved |
|
project allowing monies to be spent on the South End with no 10% loss, allow work on the North |
|
End after environmental review, spend down some debt, purchase of rolling stock, and secure |
|
future eligibility for FEMA funds. |
|
|
|
Mr. Darling reported FEMA and the Office of Emergency Services (OES) are working with NCRA |
|
to devise a project with the most flexibility. He said he plans to bring the line to Class 3 to the base |
|
of Ridge Mountain and Class 2 through the Canyon. The South End is currently a strong Class 1. |
|
|
|
Stan Dixon, Humboldt County Supervisor, requested adoption of Option 1. |
|
|
|
Carlos Benemann, Mayor of Ferndale, Board Member of the Humboldt County Waste Management |
|
Authority, Member of Humboldt County Association of Governments, encouraged adoption of |
|
Option 1 because transferring funds away from the North End indicated in Options 2, 3, and 4 is |
|
detrimental in the long term. |
|
|
|
J Warren Hockaday, Executive Director of The Greater Eureka Chamber of Commerce, read the |
|
attached letter recommending the Board approve no reallocation of funds until receiving written |
|
assurances from FEMA of future eligibility for the North End. |
|
|
|
Bonnie Neeley, Humboldt County Supervisor, recommended Option 1; move forward with the |
|
environmental issues, and make repairs to the North End thereby addressing the needs of Humboldt |
|
County’s economics. |
|
|
|
Marc Matteoli, Citizens for Port Development, iterated the strong connection between the Port and the Railroad, and indicated his view was reflected in the previous public speakers. |
|
|
|
Jimmy Smith, 1st District Commissioner of the Humboldt County Harbor District, reaffirmed the |
|
comments by previous speakers. |
|
|
|
John Franklin, recommended not using public money, but have the shippers rebuild the Railroad. |
|
|
|
Kay Strickland, Citizens for Port Development, urged support of the original improved project. |
|
|
|
Marcus Brown, President of the Northern Counties Logging Interpretive Association, suggested |
|
repair of the line begin at both ends. Repair from Scotia North will build clientele and foster future |
|
development of tourism. |
|
|
|
Fred Carmichael, declared the Canyon is repairable by public monies. |
|
|
|
Don Dunn, retired Railroad employee and consultant to Rail-Ways, spoke highly of Rail-Ways |
|
employees encouraging the Board to make a decision in their favor. |
|
|
|
Lucille Vinyard, Sierra Club, reported her agency supports repair of the Canyon and offered to |
|
write a letter to the Governor stating so. |
|
|
|
Dir. Opalach motioned to approve the original improved project. Dir. McKellar seconded. After |
|
discussion by the Board, a roll call vote was taken: Dir. McKellar, aye; Dir. Opalach, aye; Dir. |
|
Ripple, aye; Dir. Hemphill, nay; Dir. Simonson, nay; Dir. Schlienger, nay; Chair Jehn, aye. |
|
Motion passed. |
|
|
|
Chair Jehn recessed the meeting for a 10 minute break. |
|
|
|
2. Standstill Agreement – Secured Creditor |
|
This item was moved to after Closed Session. |
|
|
|
3. Claim by Union Pacific |
|
|
|
By recommendation of General Counsel Neary, Dir. McKellar motioned to reject a claim by |
|
Union Pacific. Seconded by Dir. Ripple. Vote taken; motion carried. |
|
|
|
4. Consideration of Responses to Audit Report |
|
Item was continued to a future meeting. |
|
|
|
5. Adopt Resolution of Intention to Contract with CalPers |
|
Executive Dir. Bridges reported adopting the resolution is a continuation of the effort to contract |
|
with the California Public Employees Retirement System. |
|
|
|
Dir. Hemphill motioned to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Contract with CalPers. Seconded |
|
by Dir. Ripple. Vote taken; motion passed unanimously. |
|
|
G. LIAISON REPORTS |
|
1. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Authority (NWPRA) – Max H. Bridges |
|
Executive Dir. Bridges reported NWPRA issued a Request for Proposals for property management; had some discussion of station site development; and showed their financial statements reflect |
|
forgiveness of NCRA’s rent payment providing ISTEA funds are dedicated to the South End. |
|
Their next meeting is May 1, 2000. |
|
|
|
2. Legislation – Max H. Bridges |
|
Chair Jehn mentioned the allocation from the State budget. |
|
|
|
3. Passenger – Robert Jehn |
|
The Passenger Committee has not met. |
|
|
|
4. Cities – Jack McKellar |
|
Dir. McKellar reported he has been busy in Humboldt County with issues regarding the Port and |
|
Railroad connection. |
|
|
|
5. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit Commission (SMART) – Robert Jehn |
|
Chair Jehn reported SMART is very close to completing a Proposition 116 document to access $28 |
|
million relegated for Sonoma County. In addition, the Governor’s budget proposal includes $37 |
|
million for this project. |
|
|
|
6. Contractor – Rail-Ways, Inc. |
|
Mr. Darling, President, reported the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) will not inspect the |
|
railroad until a regular source of funding is set aside for maintenance issues. The Board asked Mr. |
Bridges and Mr. Darling, and suggested Herzog, follow up with the FRA to clarify requirements of |
|
Emergency Order No. 21. |
|
|
I. STAFF REPORTS |
|
1. Executive Director – Max H. Bridges |
|
Mr. Bridges provided enlarged pictures from his flight through the Canyon, and maps of the line. |
|
|
|
2. Property Manager – Cyndee Logan |
|
Ms. Logan presented a written report to the Board. |
|
|
J. LEGAL REPORT – General Counsel Christopher J Neary |
|
Meeting with Department of Toxic Substance Control, Department of Fish and Game, and Regional |
|
Water Quality Control Board |
Mr. Neary reported meeting in March to discuss NCRA’s progress on compliance with the Consent |
Decree. Short supplemental deadlines were established and he is continuing to work with The |
McEdwards Group. |
|
|
K. MATTERS FROM BOARD MEMBERS |
|
None. |
|
|
L. ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEXT MEETING |
|
Regular Board Meeting – May 17, 2000 10:00 a.m. |
|
Eureka City Council Chambers, 531 K Street, Eureka, Humboldt County, California |
|
|
M. CLOSED SESSION – Convened at 12:45 p.m. |
|
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator |
|
Government Code Section 54956.8 |
|
Negotiating Parties: Pacific Bell, etc.; NCRA |
|
Under Negotiation: Longitudinal Easement |
|
2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation – Three Cases |
|
Government Code Section 54956.9(a) |
|
3. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation |
|
Government Code Section 54956.9 |
|
NCRA versus Green |
|
a. Quiet Title Action – Ukiah Depot |
b. Quiet Title Action – Canyon Quarries |
|
|
N. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION – Reconvened at 1:45 p.m. |
|
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator |
|
Chair Jehn announced Ms. Logan informed the Board the easement is still under negotiation. |
|
2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation – Three Cases |
|
Chair Jehn announced Mr. Neary informed the Board of three potential cases, one resulting in a |
|
unanimous decision to enter into a Standstill Agreement with Rail-Ways after incorporating |
|
proposed amendments by Mr. Neary. |
3. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation |
Chair Jehn announced information was received from Mr. Neary relative to NCRA versus Green. |
|
|
O. ADJOURNMENT |
Chair Jehn adjourned the meeting at 1:50 p.m. |